Case
Study 5: Unlawful Deportation
VIM – This lady is a citizen of the Philippines. She arrived
in the UK on 29 February 1992 when she was admitted for six months
as a visitor and applied for asylum which was refused on 9 June 1998.
She was served on 2 November 1998 with a Notice of Intention to Deport
her and her appeal against that decision was dismissed on 25 March
1999. In fact, her appeal rights were exhausted eventually on 27 May
1999.
On 16 March 2002 VIM married a British citizen and an application
for her to remain in the UK as a spouse of a British citizen was made
to the Home Office on 22 January 2003. Further representations followed
but nothing was heard from the Home Office for some time until, on
1 August 2006, the Secretary of State for the Home Department informed
the firm that a Deportation Order had been signed and served on the
client and if she did not inform the Immigration Authorities of her
plans to leave the United Kingdom by the close of play on 7 August
2006 arrangements for her deportation would be made.
With immediate effect an application was made for judicial review
of the decision of the Secretary of State to deport the client. It
was argued that such deportation would be unlawful and ought to be
revoked on the basis that the Home Office had given an undertaking
in the case of Pardipan vs SSHD (2000) INLR 447 that those unable
to raise human rights claims during the course of their asylum appeal
because the refusal of asylum had given rise to the first appeal took
place before 2 October 2000 (i.e. before the coming into the force
of the Human Rights Act) would be given time to raise them subsequently
and to appeal if necessary.
On the above basis the Secretary of State conceded that he had no
right to deport the Appellant and accordingly withdrew his intention
to do so, giving the client the right of appeal on human rights grounds.
A Consent Order was eventually signed by this firm with the Treasury
Solicitor who has agreed to pay the client’s costs to be assessed
by the Court if the amount is not agreed.